Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
- Inspections: experts role-play users to find problems (no users needed).
Exam weight Low
- Heuristic evaluation: experts check the interface against usability principles (heuristics).
Exam weight High
- Nielsen’s 10: visibility of system status · match with the real world · user control and freedom · consistency and standards · error prevention · recognition rather than recall · flexibility and efficiency · aesthetic and minimalist design · help users recognize, diagnose and recover from errors · help and documentation.
TipNielsen’s 10: visibility of system status · match with the real world · user control and freedom · consistency and standards · error prevention · recognition rather than recall · flexibility and efficiency · aesthetic and minimalist design · help users recognize, diagnose and recover from errors · help and documentation.
🎯 How this can come up · 2 questions
MCQ
A progress bar while uploading supports which heuristic?
Correct: Visibility of system status.
MCQ
An "Undo" button supports:
Correct: User control and freedom.
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
Exam weight High
- One evaluator finds ~35% of problems; 3–5 evaluators find ~75%.
🎯 How this can come up · 1 question
MCQ
How many evaluators are typically recommended for heuristic evaluation?
Correct: 3–5.
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
- Three stages: briefing session → evaluation period (each expert alone, two passes) → debriefing session (prioritize problems).
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
- Advantages: cheap, quick, no users. Problems: false alarms, misses, experts aren’t real users.
Exam weight Low
Exam weight High
- Cognitive walkthrough: simulate a user’s problem solving step by step; focuses on LEARNABILITY (ease of learning).
Memory trickThree questions: Will the user know what to do? Will they see how to do it? Will they understand from the feedback whether it worked?
🎯 How this can come up · 1 question
MCQ
Cognitive walkthroughs mainly evaluate:
Correct: Ease of learning.
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
Exam weight Low
- Pluralistic walkthrough: users, developers and usability experts step through a scenario together.
Exam weight High
- A/B testing: show two versions to different groups of real users online and compare a metric (clicks, conversions).
🎯 How this can come up · 1 question
MCQ
Showing half of visitors a green button and half a blue one, then comparing clicks, is:
Correct: A/B testing.
Exam weight Low
No slides match this filter.









