What Risk Assessment Is and Why It Matters
Risk assessment (RA) is performed to identify the most serious risks. There are two primary methods:
Calculates monetary values with predefined formulas.
Uses values or words assigned to the probability of a risk occurring and its impact if it occurs.
Importance of risk assessment
- RAs are an important part of the risk management process.
- Without an RA, it is difficult to determine which systems should be protected, and unclear how to protect them.
- An RA identifies the most important systems to protect.
- It gives insight into which controls will provide the most value.
After identifying threats, vulnerabilities, and asset value, you need the likelihood and impact of each threat on the assets, then prioritize the risks to know which must be treated first.
When to Conduct a Risk Assessment
Risk assessment is a continuous process. It should be conducted:
When evaluating risk in the SDLC
At project initiation, company startup, and similar starting points.
When evaluating a security control
During periodic monitoring.
After a control is implemented
To ensure its suitability and functionality.
Not a one-time event
An RA done once and filed away quickly becomes outdated. Assets, threats, and controls change, so the assessment must be repeated.
Critical Components: Scope, Critical Areas, Team
Critical areas example
| In-scope system | Critical area to focus on |
|---|---|
| Web server | Single point of failure (SPOF); OS update/patch status |
| Database server | Only the data exchanged with the web server |
| Firewall | Inspection of all traffic |
Memory trick · S-C-T
Scope, Critical areas, Team
where the boundary is, what matters inside it, and who is independent enough to judge it.
Quantitative Risk Assessment
Quantitative assessment is an objective method. It uses numbers such as actual dollar values, requires a significant amount of data that takes a long time to gather, and is essentially a simple math problem using formulas.
| Term | Meaning | Example from the slides |
|---|---|---|
| SLE Single loss expectancy | Total loss expected from a single incident (when a threat exploits a vulnerability); includes hardware, software, and data. | $5,000 |
| ARO Annual rate of occurrence | Number of times an incident is expected per year. | Once a month → ARO = 12 |
| ALE Annual loss expectancy | Expected loss for a year = SLE × ARO (a dollar value). | $5,000 × 12 = $60,000 |
| Safeguard value | The cost of a control used to mitigate risk. | $50 anti-virus × 100 computers = $5,000 |
FormulaALE = SLE × AROSavings with control = ALE(before) − ALE(after) − Control cost
Benefits and limitations
Mathematical calculation with accurate, objective results; verifiable facts without debate; can be automated (e.g. Excel).
Accurate data isn't always available; hard to ensure people use the control as expected.
Worked Example: Stolen Laptops
A company issues laptops worth $2,000 each (hardware, software, and data). About 100 laptops are in use. Over the past two years the company lost one laptop per quarter, stolen when left unattended.
| Question | Answer | Why |
|---|---|---|
| SLE? | $2,000 | One stolen laptop loses its full value. |
| ARO? | 4 | One per quarter = 4 per year. |
| ALE? | $8,000 | $2,000 × 4. |
Should the company buy hardware locks?
Locks cost $10 each, so the safeguard value is $10 × 100 = $1,000. With locks, the ARO is expected to drop from 4 to 1.
Current ALE (before the control)
$2,000 × 4 = $8,000
ARO with the control
1
ALE with the control (after)
$2,000 × 1 = $2,000
Savings with the control
$8,000 − $2,000 − $1,000 = $5,000
Decision
Savings are positive ($5,000), so yes, buy the locks: they cost $1,000 a year but cut expected losses by $6,000.
Qualitative Risk Assessment
Qualitative assessment is a subjective method. It uses relative values based on expert opinion. Experts give their input on the probability and impact of a risk, so a qualitative RA can be completed rather quickly.
FormulaRisk level = Probability × Impact
Putting it together
Each risk is plotted on a probability × impact matrix, and the results are written up in a risk assessment report listing risks from highest to lowest level.
Risk Determination Formula
For relative risk assessment, risk equals the likelihood of vulnerability occurrence times value (or impact), minus the percentage of risk already controlled, plus an element of uncertainty.
FormulaRisk = (Likelihood × Value) − (% controlled × Likelihood × Value) + (% uncertainty × Likelihood × Value)
Likelihood
- The probability that a specific vulnerability will be the object of a successful attack.
- Assign a number between 0.1 (low) and 1.0 (high), or between 1 and 100 (%).
- Zero is not used: vulnerabilities with zero likelihood are removed from the asset/vulnerability list.
Uncertainty
If data is 90% accurate, uncertainty = 1 − 0.9 = 10%. If 80% accurate, uncertainty = 20%.
Worked examples from the slides
| Case | Inputs | Calculation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset A, vulnerability 1 | Value 50, likelihood 1.0, 0% controlled, 90% accurate (10% uncertainty) | (50×1.0) − 0 + 10%(50) = 50 − 0 + 5 | 55 |
| Asset B, vulnerability 2 | Value 100, likelihood 0.5, 50% controlled, 80% accurate (20% uncertainty) | (100×0.5) − 50%(50) + 20%(50) = 50 − 25 + 10 | 35 |
| Asset B, vulnerability 3 | Value 100, likelihood 0.1, 0% controlled, 80% accurate (20% uncertainty) | (100×0.1) − 0 + 20%(10) = 10 − 0 + 2 | 12 |
Memory trick · Compute the base first
- BaseLikelihood × Value
Then subtract controlled% of the base and add uncertainty% of the same base.
Documenting the Results
- The final summary is comprised in a ranked (vulnerability) risk worksheet.
- The ranked risk worksheet is the initial working document for the next step in the risk management process: assessing and controlling risk.
| Deliverable | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Information asset classification worksheet | Assembles information about information assets and their impact. |
| Weighted criteria analysis worksheet | Assigns a ranked value or impact weight to each information asset. |
| Ranked vulnerability risk worksheet | Assigns a ranked risk rating for each uncontrolled asset–vulnerability pair. |
Using the examples
Ranking the three worked examples gives A/V1 (55) first, B/V2 (35) second, and B/V3 (12) third.
Exam Tips & Tricks
Two methods
Quantitative = monetary values with formulas (objective). Qualitative = words/values for probability and impact from experts (subjective, quick).
When to assess
Continuously: SDLC/project start, periodic control monitoring, and after a control is implemented.
S-C-T
Scope = boundary; critical areas = focus; team ≠ people who fix deficiencies (conflict of interest).
Core formulas
ALE = SLE × ARO. Savings = ALE before − ALE after − control cost.
Laptop activity
SLE $2,000, ARO 4, ALE $8,000; locks $1,000, ARO → 1, ALE after $2,000; savings $5,000 → buy.
Likelihood scale
0.1–1.0 or 1–100%. Zero is never used; such vulnerabilities are removed.
Risk determination
Risk = L×V − controlled%(L×V) + uncertainty%(L×V). Examples: 55, 35, 12.
Three deliverables
Asset classification worksheet, weighted criteria analysis worksheet, ranked vulnerability risk worksheet.
Flashcards — Test Yourself
Say the answer out loud, then flip the card to check. Shuffle the deck to test yourself in a new order.
Quick Reference — Everything at a Glance
| Topic | Key Point |
|---|---|
| Risk assessment | Performed to identify the most serious risks. |
| Quantitative RA | Objective; dollar values; lots of data and time; formulas. |
| Qualitative RA | Subjective; expert opinion on probability and impact; quick. |
| When to conduct RA | SDLC/project initiation, periodic control monitoring, after control implementation. |
| Scope | Boundary of the RA: what is and isn't included. |
| Critical areas | Important parts to focus on (web server SPOF, exchanged data, firewall inspection). |
| Team | Not the people responsible for fixing deficiencies; avoids conflict of interest. |
| SLE | Total loss from a single incident. |
| ARO | Incidents expected per year. |
| ALE | SLE × ARO. |
| Safeguard value | Cost of a control (e.g. $50 × 100 computers = $5,000). |
| Savings with control | ALE before − ALE after − control cost. |
| Quantitative benefits / limits | Objective, verifiable, automatable / data not always available, control use not guaranteed. |
| Probability / impact | Likelihood a threat exploits a vulnerability / magnitude of loss. |
| Risk determination | L × V − % controlled + % uncertainty. |
| Likelihood values | 0.1 to 1.0 or 1 to 100; zero not used. |
| Ranked risk worksheet | Final summary; starting point for assessing and controlling risk. |